Aman Ki Asha: Truth or Fiction?

By Abdullah Abdullah

A well-known Media Group has taken upon its self to single handedly, or it seems that way, change or condition us towards a new paradigm shift in geopolitics by undermining a very difficult to overcome social differences stamping between two nations born over differences in social systems. At one extent every soul is accountable and equal accept in piety bowing physically and psychologically to one Supreme Being Allah, while on the other extent stands Aryan Brahamic facism which calls for bowing to crores of false gods and segregating humanity permanently to ensure perpetual enslavement on false pretense of religion.

 

Repeatedly we have witnessed betrayal and consistence reliance on power by India to breakup Pakistan’s geography and united will of its people consisting of both Muslims and Non-Muslims. Prime Minister Nawab Sharif went to extreme in Aman Ki Asha by ordering Pak Army to restraint from retaliation to LOC firing by Indian Forces to enable just conclusion on international forum. However, as expected that too failed as international forums such as UNO do not show their willingness to control India, whereas they enforce all UN resolutions against Muslim lands such as Indonesia, Sudan, Palestine (to create Israel), etc. This topic of biased of UNO to enforce resolutions is a separate topic deserving separate article thus we will stay to the current topic.

 

It is gravely dangerous, sinister, and futile to brainwash Pakistan public through deception of false hope (Aman ki Asha) that peace with India is possible by flying peace doves or childish exchange of nautinkiwalas (entertainment industry). Rather it’s outright blasphemous to sacrifices of millions of Muslim who were butchered before during and after 1947 up till now in espionage activities in Pakistan and other places like Gujarat, Assam, Kashmir and countless incidents that go unreported in media.

 

Peace is a derivative of social impetus towards it, that in turn rely on cultural aspects such as religion, history, social transformations enacted and distribution of power in all its forms. In case of India all these factors came together to give birth to snake of Hindutva in Indian subcontinent during 1800s. This Hindu snake sole purpose of existence, very similar to Zionist form of Jewish nationalism that do not accept Bani Israelis converted to Christianity or Islam, is destruction of all non-Hindu existence in subcontinent. Ironically, Hindutva Aryan roots share similarity with Hitler Aryan World Domination Evil Plans as its social transformation agenda is directly imported from Germany and Italy experiences. However, Zionists totally disregard this similarity in their mutual hatred of Islam and Muslims with Hindutva militants resulting in accepting of 21^st century Hitlerism, same ism they blame for killing of 6 million European Jews.

 

Until Pakistan Public understands the reasons for the hatred of Hindutva India towards Muslims India or Pakistan, they can never formulate optimum strategy based on deterrence of clear threat to India in case it rely on force rather principles of justice and peace towards all its neighbors. What Media or specific Media Group hides will help us to understand why Pak Army continue to motivate Pakistan political leaders as well as public to become active stakeholders in national security and work together to ensure stronger Pakistan as relevant in current news such as desire to create Security Council, etc. India real face post-independence and actual extent of success of social transformation initiated by Priest of Hindutva came out into the limelight post USSR Era and winning of elections of political wing of Hindutva doctrine BJP, RSS, and other violent Hindu parties controlling corridors of powers in Delhi, and important cities like Mumbai.

Hindutva for Akhand Bharat (Undivided India)

A recent documentary from BBC “The World before Her” show women of urban and rural regions conscripted in Hindu militant extremists groups, so respectfully and diplomatically called “self interest groups” prepare for battle. Here is the link.Hindutva Women Warriors

Hindu militant groups religiously follow Hindutva. Hindutva or “Hinduness”, is a word coined by Vinayak Damodar Savarkar in his 1923 pamphlet entitled “Hindutva: Who is a Hindu?” It is the term used to describe movements advocating Hindu nationalism, with members called Hindutvavadis. According to 1995 Supreme Court of India judgment, the word Hindutva could be used to mean “the way of life of the Indian people and the Indian culture or ethos”.  Thus HINDUTVA importance in Indian Society reflects clearly when highest Judiciary institution gives a verdict on meaning of the word that encompasses a society transforming ideology.

 

Hindutva Zionist Experiment in South Asia

Savarkar conscripted a principal to whitewash Hindu religion to show similarity and draw political advantage from acceptance of Super Powers to allow creation of Israel on Palestine land based on an absurd concept of antiquity. The serpent Savarkar acquired deceitful Jewish concept of antique racial unity with attachment to land, to drive to a political momentum the recognition that ONLY HINDUS HAS THE RIGHT TO INHABIT INDIA. However, here is the catch Hindutva advocates Akhand Bharat, which comprises of all area South of Himalaya and Hindu Kush. How many Muslim countries lie below it, please check it out. I quote from Hindutva: Who is Hindu?:

“the Aryans who settled in India at the dawn of history already formed a nation, now embodied in the Hindus…. Hindus are bound together not only by the tie of the love they bear to a common fatherland and by the common blood that courses through their veins and keeps our hearts throbbing and our affection warm but also by the tie of the common homage we pay to our great civilisation, our Hindu culture.” P. 108

 

Hindutva is Neo Nazism

Zionist in their sinful efforts of aggressively reducing Islamic threat after occupation of Muslims homeland accepted the courting of Savarkar, the details present in upcoming sections, not realizing that Savarkar belongs to same gang of Nazis who slaughter Jews in Europe, the very reason that facilitated Zionist in snatching the homeland of Muslims in Palestine. Refer to Savarkar writing from Hindutva: Who is Hindu?, page 108 above and Madhavrao Sadashivrao Golwalkar, popularly known as Guruji, was the second “Sarsanghchalak” (supreme chief) of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (extremist group of Hindutva). He sheds “dark light” on evolved Neo Nazism of India:

He believed that Semitic monotheism and exclusivism were incompatible with and against the native Hindu culture. He wrote “Those creeds (Islam and Christianity) have one prophet, one scripture and one God, other than whom there is no path of salvation for the human soul. It requires no great intelligence to see the absurdity of such a proposition”. [MS Golwalkar, Bunch of thoughts, Sahitya Sindhu Prakashan, 19262]

 

“From this standpoint, sanctioned by the experience of shrewd old nations, the foreign races in Hindusthan must either adopt the Hindu culture and language, must learn to respect and hold in reverence Hindu religion, must entertain no idea but those of the glorification of the Hindu race and culture, i.e. of the Hindu nation, and must lose their separate existence to merge in the Hindu race; or may stay in the country, wholly subordinated to the Hindu Nation, claiming nothing, deserving no privileges, far less any preferential treatment — not even citizen’s rights.” [We, or, Our Nationhood Defined (Nagpur: Bharat Publications, 1939), pp. 47f and 55f]

 

“To keep up the purity of the Race and its culture, Germany shocked the world by her purging the country of the Semitic races — the Jews. Race pride at its highest has been manifested here. Germany has also shown how well-nigh impossible it is for Races and cultures, having differences going to the root, to be assimilated into one united whole, a good lesson for us in Hindusthan to learn and profit by.” [We, or, Our Nationhood Defined (Nagpur: Bharat Publications, 1939), p. 35]

 

“There is nothing to prove that it (i.e. the caste system) ever hindered our social developments. Actually the caste system has helped to preserve the unity of our society.”[Bunch of Thoughts (Bangalore: Rashtrotthana Sahitya, 1966), p.108]

 

The first RSS leader to become explicitly connected with rising fascism in Europe was Dr. B.S. Moonje, who visited Italy in 1931.  Moonje met Mussolini in March of that year and during the week of March 19-24, 1931 he toured a variety of fascist Military institutions in Rome and, most important, the Balilla (Mussolini’s youth organization) and Avanguardisti organizations.  Of the Balilla, Moonje wrote,

 

“The Balilla institutions and the conception of the whole organization have appealed to me most, though there is still not discipline and organization of high order.  The whole idea is conceived by Mussolini for the military regeneration of Italy. Italians, by nature, appear ease–loving and non–martial, like the Indians generally.  They have cultivated, like Indians, the work of peace and neglected the cultivation of the art of war.  Mussolini saw the essential weakness of his country and conceived the idea of the Balilla organization. … Nothing better could have been conceived for the military organization of Italy.”[Marzia Casolari:Economic & Political Weekly 22/01/2000]

  

Here are some more quotes:

“The idea of fascism vividly brings out the conception of unity amongst people… India and particularly Hindu Indians need some such institution for the military regeneration of the Hindus:….Our institution of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh of Nagpur under Dr. Hedgewar is of this kind, though quite independently conceived. I will spend the rest of my life in developing and extending this Institution of Dr. Hedgewar all throughout Maharashtra and other provinces.” — Dr. B.S. Moonje, Diary Entry

 

“Leaders should imitate the youth movement of Germany and the Balilla and Fascist organizations of Italy.  I think they are eminently suited for introduction in India, adapting them to suit the special conditions.  I have been very much impressed by these movements and I have seen their activities with my own eyes in all details.” — ‘Dr. B.S. Moonje on the Round Table Conference,’ an interview in The Mahratta, April 12, 1931.

 

“This training is meant for qualifying and fitting our boys for the game of killing masses of men with the ambition of winning victory with the best possible causalities (sic) of dead and wounded while causing the utmost possible to the adversary.” — Dr. B.S. Moonje, “Preface to the Scheme of the Central Hindu Military Society and its Military School”

 

“I absolutely disbelieve in perpetual peace which is detrimental and negative to the fundamental virtues of man, which only by struggle reveal themselves in the light of the sun. …… Fascism believes neither in the possibility nor the utility of perpetual peace…” — Quotations from Benito Mussolini, “Doctrine of Fascism,” in Dr. B.S. Moonje, “Preface to the Scheme of the Central Hindu Military Society and its Military School”

 

“…Surely Hitler knows better than Pandit Nehru does what suits Germany best. The very fact that Germany or Italy has so wonderfully recovered and grown so powerful as never before at the touch of Nazi or Fascist magical wand is enough to prove that those political “isms” were the most congenial tonics their health demanded.  India may choose or reject particular form of government, in accordance with her political requirements.  But Pandit went out of his way when he took sides in the name of all Indians against Germany or Italy. Pandit Nehru might claim to express the Congress section in India at the most. But it should be made clear to the German, Italian, or Japanese public that crores of Hindu Sanghatanists in India whom neither Pandit Nehru nor the Congress represents, cherish no ill-will towards Germany or Italy or Japan or any other country in the world simply because they had chosen a form of government or constitutional policy which they though (sic) suited best and contributed most to their national solidarity and strength.” — Speech of V.D. Savarkar, August 1, 1938, quoted in Marzia Casolari, “Hindutva’s Foreign Tie-Up in the 1930s: Archival Evidence“

 

Jews Predicament: To Love or Not to Love

The racist Aryans of Germany and Old India followed similar social transformation ideals of Greeks which entails categorization of population based on physical, mental and social basis, and institutionalized them brutally on the whole of South Asia. Thus, population categorized and suppressed ended up as slaves indefinitely to religious beliefs dividing Sons of Adam into masters as Greek use to call Guardians and slaves. The Caste System of Hinduism is another topic, which we will not discuss here. Jews following blindly Zionist nationalist agenda and all of us must also know the Nazi and Hindu connection goes to core of Aryan Supremacy that Hitler used to kill Jews and others innocent races. Here is one of the proof of that intimacy between Hindus and Nazis:

Heinrich Himmler (the Reichsführer of the SS), the person ordered by Adolf Hitler to implement the Final Solution, or The Holocaust,[1] told his personal masseur Felix Kersten that he always carried with him a copy of the ancient Aryan scripture, the Bhagavad Gita because it relieved him of guilt about what he was doing – he felt that like the warrior Arjuna, he was simply doing his duty without attachment to his actions.[2]

Himmler was also interested in Buddhism and his institute Ahnenerbe sought to mix some traditions from Hinduism and Buddhism[3] – Gautama Buddha’s original name for the religion we now call Buddhism was The Aryan Path.[4] Himmler sent a 1939 German expedition to Tibet as part of his research into Aryan origins.

 [1] Himmler noted on 26 July 1942 in response to Rosenberg’s attempt to influence Jewish policy that “The occupied territories will be Jew-free. The Fuhrer has laid the implementation of this very difficult order on my shoulders.” Evans, Richard J. The Third Reich at War New York:2008 Penguin Page 271; Himmler had begun the initial pre-Wansee Conference implementation of the final solution by July and August of 1941. Evans, Richard J. The Third Reich at War New York:2008 Penguin Page 240.

[2] Padfield, Peter Himmler New York:1990–Henry Holt Page 402

[3] P.7, New Religions and the Nazis, By Karla Powne

[4] Wells, H.G. The Outline of History New York:1920 Doubleday & Co. See chapter on Gautama Buddha

 

Jews and Hindus who read the above section will not know how to react to this revelation of what it means to be a Hindu or aligning himself or herself with Aryan Brahmin Savarkar. Savarkar faced the predicament of how to make “Hinduism less Hindu” without which he could not get support from others or unite non-Aryans South Asians under his new ideology of Hindutva for “cleansing” of India from non-Hindus. Therefore, he played an deceitfully schemed to attracted two groups, one who are racist Hindus, who would benefit with power and wealth in “Hindu India”, and other lower caste Hindus who wanted recognition and racial equity. How gullibly people innovate their religion, not realizing that True Religion is perfect and if it is not, than it not worth following. Savarkar not wanting to let go of Hinduism, he did what we can call an innovation in religion to undermine Hinduism based on caste system.

 

Hindu Abrahamic Evolution

Savarkar launched a movement for religious reform advocating dismantling the system of caste to ascertain religious unity in essence changing the core pillar of traditional Hindu faith and reconversion of the converted Hindus back to Hindu religion. He ironically followed Abrahamic religious belief of one nation to which belong Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Savarkar created the term Hindutva, and emphasized its distinctiveness from Hinduism, which he wanted to associate with social and political disunity. Savarkar’s Hindutva sought to create an inclusive collective identity, to create a GREATER HINDU LAND, where all Hindus live as a cohesive unit to further the cause of Hindu religion. Many claim that Savarkar was an atheist social reformer, as if it will reduce the evil that he preached to new India. Hindutva is Hinduism, if not, than it deals with consolidation of power in the hands of one race which occupied North India and now claims the largest population, Hindu Aryans. Hindutva utilizes militancy as an effective tool to unite Hindus and intimidate others, while incorporating political strategy to further it cause in India and around the world for greater Akhand Bharat.

 

Militancy for Akhand Bharat (undivided India)

Savarkar believed that the Indian subcontinent (which includes the area south of the Himalaya and the Hindu Kush or Akhand Bharat (undivided India) is the homeland of the Hindus. He considered “Hindus” as those who consider India to be their motherland, fatherland as well as their holy land. Hindu militancy comprised of religious, cultural, political and ethnic implications. This Hindu fundamentalism gradually emerged through a significant contribution of various movements like

• Brahma Samaj (1818)
• Arya Samaj (1875)
• Brahma Theosophical Society (1875)
• Hindu literary Society
• Sadur Veda Siddanta Sabha (1845)
• Hindu debating Society (1850)

These movements with their sole aim to create Hindu Rastra (only Hindus as citizens), expedited their aims, through related entities known collectively as ‘The Sangh Parivar’. Major organizations operating Sangh Parivar umbrella to realize their cause or Hindutva are as follows:

 

The Rastria Swayasevak Sangh (RSS)

RSS is the most aggressive Hindu fundamentalist movement founded by Keshav Baliram Hedgewar in the year 1925. RSS has now spread to more than 45,000 branches encompassing a formidable network of organizations. It is militant by nature and so prepares its members to fight for Hindutva physically and mentally. RSS is mad with rage in eliminating the Muslims and Christians with its separatist worldview. How would you stand up? Would you stand up by opening up of your market?

 

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)

BJP, formally declared as a political party in the year 1951 is the political wing striving to establish Hindu Rastra. It does not have an ideology of its own but purely a puppet in the hands of RSS. While BJP was governing in the year 1999, Vengaiah Naidu, the then General Secretary of BJP in an interview said, “We have made a National Democratic Alliance with the other supporting parties in order to implement a general agenda but we will never give up the agenda we have for India”. After the victory in Gujarat of Narendra Modi, a RSS member since childhood during whose tenure murdering of Muslims occurred in 2001, highest-ranking leader Advani considered the victory as the victory of the Hindutva strategy and confirms to follow the same strategy in the next Parliament election. The United States Department of State in its International Religious Freedom Report 2003 commented on the episode,[1] based on a report by USCIRF:

“India’s National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), an official body, found evidence in the killings of premeditation by members of Hindu extremist groups; complicity by Gujarat state government officials; and police inaction in the midst of attacks on Muslims. The NHRC also noted “widespread reports and allegations of well-organized persons, armed with mobile telephones and addresses, singling out certain homes and properties for death and destruction in certain districts-sometimes within view of police stations and personnel,” suggesting the attacks may have been planned in advance. Christians were also victims in Gujarat, and many churches were destroyed.”[2]

  

[1]International Religious Freedom Report 2003. By the United States Department of State. Retrieved on 19 April 2007.

[2]United States Commission on International Religious Freedom. “Countries of Particular Concern: INDIA”. Archived from the original on 25 Dec. 2007. Retrieved 26 Mar. 2008.

 

The Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP)

VHP aims at the collective power of Hindus against Muslims and Christians. It wants to unite all Hindu sects and Hindus living abroad into one Hindu umbrella. VHP has proved its fundamentalist nature through intolerance towards the other and demolishing the worship places of enemies. By declaring Muslims and Christians as the eternal enemies of Hindus, VHP wants to succeed in polarizing Hindu sentiments. VHP asserts itself as the World Council of Hindus. What are you doing to unite the Ummah?

 

Even USA is not safe from their agenda, here are some examples:

In his “Letter to A Young Hindu,” (www.passtheroti.com) Vijay Prashad, the George and Martha Kellner Chair in South Asian History and Professor of International Studies at Trinity College in Hartford, Connecticut, writes: “More than a decade ago, I used the term “Yankee Hindutva” to describe the way Hindu chauvinism came into the United States. Eager to branch out to the Diaspora, the RSS and its subsidiaries … took advantage of multiculturalism to build their foothold here. Not for the American audience an unadulterated anti-Muslim rhetoric (that would come only in some “safe” spaces, and more aggressively, after 9/11).”

 

American filmmaker Nina Paley who received death threats from the Hindu right in America for her animated movie, Sita Sings The Blues, (www.sitasingstheblues.com) is quoted by Saumya Arya Haas, in The Huffington Post, (7/25/11) as saying, “It’s like calling the Ku Klux Klan “Christians.” Calling Hindutvadis “Hindus” is especially misleading in the U.S., where people are mostly unaware of violent nationalist groups in India. Last I checked, Hinduism wasn’t a religion of hate and intolerance. Hindutvadis’ motives are political, not religious, and they hide behind a religious label. Not only does this confuse many Americans into thinking they have some legitimacy, it also, over the long run, harms real Hindus, who are nothing like Hindutvadis.”

 

Moral obligations of Hindu individual in Hindutva

All those who are of Hindu race, professing Hindu faith and practicing Hindu culture must contribute to the establishment of Hindu Rastra. Every Hindu has the moral obligation to:

• Get united and fight against the non-Hindus
• Forcefully convert the non-Hindus to Hinduism in order to glorify the Hindu race and culture.
• Demolish the places of worship of the non-Hindus. E.g. The demolish of Babri Masjid
• Reject the pluralistic culture
• Treat Muslims and Christians as subordinates, underclass, the other, and as 2nd class citizens.

Thus, according to the Hindu fundamentalism, human dignity is to be given only to the Hindus. The Indian history witnesses how Hindu fundamentalism has expressed its hatred towards Muslims and Christians through a serial of bloodsheds. Muslims are the primary targets of Hindutva.

 

Cannibalistic attitude towards the Muslims

The demolition of Babri Masjid on Dec 6, 1992 gave a grave shock to the Muslims. Disregarding the feelings of the Muslims Advani considered the demolition of Babri Masjid“as an act of God; an act of national pride. Another unforgettable trauma for the Muslims is their victimization in Gujarat in 2002. Tehelka Investigation reports how Hindu fundamentalists “found a pregnant woman by name Kauser Banu and tore her stomach with a knife, than they pierced the baby with the knife, crushed it on the ground, and threw it on the flames. 

 

Targeting the Christians

Christians are subject to all kinds of violence. The United Christians Forum for Human Rights complained, “Nuns have been raped, priests executed, Bibles burnt, Churches demolished, educational institutions destroyed and religious people harassed in India”. Attacks on Christians in Orissa stands as a clear witness to the violence against the Christians.

 

India and Israel Unholy Alliance

The proponents of Hindutva and Zionist Jews are natural allies as Sarvarkar realized it and welcomed the state of Israel. Savarkar in a statement issued on 19 December 1947, expressed joy at the recognition of the claim of Jewish people to establish an independent Jewish state, and likened the event to the glorious day on which Moses led them out of Egyptian bondage. He considered that justice demanded restoration of entire Palestine to the Jews, their historical holy land and Fatherland. He regretted India’s vote at the United Nations Organization against the creation of the Jewish state terming the vote a policy of appeasement of Muslims.

Thus to understand current alliance of India, Israel it is necessary to comprehend the past, the starting of this sinister affair, the courting of Israel by Savarkar.

 

Here are some more references for statements of Veer Savarkar

 

The modern seer of Hindu identity, and indeed the one who in fact coined the term “Hindutva”, which to both its supporters and detractors conjures up the image of modern Hindu identity, Vinayak Dimodar Savarkar was the only political leader in India who explicitly recognised that the Jews had the right to their own state. This was as far back as 1908. [Dhananjay Keer, Veer Savarkar, 1988 (originally 1950, 1966), Popular Prakashan, Mumbai, p.467]

 In his  Hindutva, the political treatise of 1923, for which he is best known, he wrote these words:

 

…..if the Zionists’ dreams were realised, if Palestine became a Jewish State, it would gladden us almost as much as our Jewish friends. [Veer Savarkar, Hindutva, 1923, p.112]

 In 1948, Israel was  founded, and Savarkar expressed his sentiments thus:

 

I am glad to note that the overwhelming majority of the leading nations in the world have recognised the claim of the Jewish people to establish an independent Jewish State in Palestine and should have promised armed assistance to see it realised. After centuries of sufferings, sacrifices and struggle the Jews will soon recover their national Home in Palestine, which has undoubtedly been their Fatherland. [Koenraad Elst, The Saffron Swastika, Voice of India, New Delhi, 2001, p.381]

 

When the Zionist dreams were in fact realised, Savarkar saw their project as an example that an independent India could learn from, as in this statement from 1952:

 

Even a tiny state like Israel has sensibly started developing fish field and sand fruits and because of that they are able to meet the needs of the countless immigrants who would have otherwise half-starved. The Jews are a brave and intelligent people. And although their State looks like a child before our great state of Bharat we must emulate its example. [Keer, op. cit., p.444]

 

In 1956, he castigated the Congress Party government of Jawaharlal Nehru for not recognising the Jewish state:

But bear in mind if tomorrow there breaks out a war between Pakistan and Bharat almost all Muslims will be arrayed on the side of Pakistan in opposition to us and their enemy Israel will be our only friend. Therefore, I say that Bharat should give unequivocal recognition to Israel. If we desire to safeguard the independence of Bharat we should be militarily strong. [Keer, op. cit., p.499]

 

Savarkar in December1947:

Judging from the Indian press in general our public seems to be misinformed by a sinister pro-Muslim propaganda regarding this Palestine issue. It must be emphasised therefore that speaking historically, the whole of Palestine has been, from at least two thousand years before the birth of the Moslem Prophet, the National Home of the Jewish People. . .The Fatherland or the Holy land of the Arabian Muslims lies in Arabia and not in Palestine. In justice, therefore, the whole of Palestine ought to have been restored to the Jews. But taking into account the conflict of self-interest of the powerful nations in the UNO, their support to the resuscitation of the Jewish State in a part if Palestine at any rate, wherein they still happen to be in a majority and which includes some of their prominent Holy Places constitute an event of historical justice and importance. [Elst, Saffron Swastika, pp.381-2]

 

Savarkar was incensed at Shrimati Vijayalakshmi, the Indian ambassador to the United Nations:

It is consequently to be regretted that the delegation which represented our Hindusthani Government in the UNO should have voted against the creation of the Jewish State. The speeches of Shrimati Vijayalakshmi in particular were justly ridiculed when she claimed melodramatically that the Indian Government refused to stab the unity and integrity of the Palestine State in the back of by carving out a separate Jewish State, forgetting for the while that the very Indian Government had stabbed the unity and integrity of their own nation only the other day. [Elst, Saffron Swastika, pp.381-2]

 

Cynics will claim that Savarkar was being merely opportunist. However this ignores the fact that in 1908, 1923, and even up to 1947 when Savarkar made pro-Zionist statements, there was no political entity known as Israel. So one needs to look deeper. It was the ideological similarity of Hindutva and Zionism, so much hated by Leftists of today, which was the deciding factor:

[Vijay Prashad, Imperialism , Israel & India, Hindutva-Zionism: An Alliance of the New Epoch, 2002, http://www.between-lines.org/archives/2002/feb/Vijay_Prashad.htm]

 

In a way, the atheist Veer Savarkar was the Hindu counterpart of a Zionist: he defined the Hindus as a Nation attached to a Motherland, rather than as a religious community. True, there is an obvious difference between the situation of the Jews, who had yet to migrate to their Motherland (“Next year in Jerusalem”), and the Hindus who merely had to remove the non-Hindu (British, then Nehruvain and, in Pakistan, Islamic) regime from their territory. The Hindus are already in Delhi, and merely have to change it into Indraprastha. [Koenraad Elst, Decolonizing the Hindu Mind, Voice of India, New Delhi, 2001, p.472]

 

The unholy alliance of Zionist Hindutvavadis is as old as India and Israel itself. Savarkar drew similarities between Zionist efforts, ambitions to take over Palestine and demolish Al Aqsa Mosque to build Solomon Temple a gross innovation in religion, and Hindutvavadis experiment in wiping India clean of Non-Hindus craving support from Zionist Jews.

 

Balance Approach to deal with Hindutva Imperialism

Do you still believe in passive stance or are you now thinking of a balance approach?

This should be the first responses to Hindu militancy along with other strategies base on deterrence and justice. Allah, the Exalted, says  in Surah Al-Anfal, Verses 60-61:

وَأَعِدُّواْ لَهُم مَّا ٱسۡتَطَعۡتُم مِّن قُوَّةٍ۬ وَمِن رِّبَاطِ ٱلۡخَيۡلِ تُرۡهِبُونَ بِهِۦ عَدُوَّ ٱللَّهِ وَعَدُوَّڪُمۡ وَءَاخَرِينَ مِن دُونِهِمۡ لَا تَعۡلَمُونَهُمُ ٱللَّهُ يَعۡلَمُهُمۡ‌ۚ وَمَا تُنفِقُواْ مِن شَىۡءٍ۬ فِى سَبِيلِ ٱللَّهِ يُوَفَّ إِلَيۡكُمۡ وَأَنتُمۡ لَا تُظۡلَمُونَ

And make ready against them all you can of power, including steeds of war (tanks, planes, missiles, artillery) to threaten the enemy of Allâh and your enemy, and others besides whom, you may not know but whom Allâh does know. And whatever you shall spend in the Cause of Allâh shall be repaid unto you, and you shall not be treated unjustly.

وَإِن جَنَحُواْ لِلسَّلۡمِ فَٱجۡنَحۡ لَهَا وَتَوَكَّلۡ عَلَى ٱللَّهِ‌ۚ إِنَّهُ ۥ هُوَ ٱلسَّمِيعُ ٱلۡعَلِيمُ

But if they incline to peace, you also incline to it, and (put your) trust in Allâh. Verily, He is the All-Hearer, the All-Knower.

 

Thus Hindutva India will and shall only be subdued with balance approach of carrot and stick strategy. For all those advocating Aman Ki Asha without deterrence or claiming falsely that India and Pakistan are one in soul, I leave their case to Almightily and after that to the Public of Pakistan.